feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols

Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures
and practices:

Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer,
Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina,
Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence,
Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa,
Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio,
Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban,
Filipino utari, Ainu practices

Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee,
Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta,
Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning

Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats,
Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen
Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective,
Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning

Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance,
Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance,
Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo

Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing,
Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror,
Appreciative apology repair

Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle,
Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette

Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar

Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols

All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in
descriptions. All YAML files validated.

seeds/consensus-with-facilitator.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+id: consensus-with-facilitator
+title: Consensus Decision with Facilitator
+description: >-
+  A facilitated consensus process in which a group works toward agreement
+  that everyone can support or at least not block. Common in cooperative and
+  activist organising, drawing on Quaker and collective practice.
+source: Seeds for Change, "Consensus Decision Making"
+source_url: https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus
+tags: [consensus, decision-making, facilitation]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Present the proposal
+    description: >-
+      A proposer summarises the proposal and the need it addresses, then
+      yields to questions of clarification only — not opinions.
+  - headline: Gather concerns
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator invites concerns and reservations, listed visibly
+      without debate. Each concern is a chance to improve the proposal.
+  - headline: Amend and discuss
+    description: >-
+      The group discusses amendments that address concerns, with the
+      facilitator tracking proposals and checking for agreement on each
+      change.
+  - headline: Test for consensus
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator asks whether anyone cannot live with the revised
+      proposal. A block must come with a reasoned explanation and an offer to
+      help find a solution.
+  - headline: Confirm and record
+    description: >-
+      The decision is restated, written down with any reservations noted, and
+      the action steps and responsible parties are confirmed.
+outcome: >-
+  A decision that all participants can support, with dissent engaged rather
+  than overridden.
+practice: >-
+  Distinguish a block from a stand-aside. A block is rare and serious — when
+  blocks recur, revisit the proposal's assumptions or the group's shared aims.