feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols

Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures
and practices:

Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer,
Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina,
Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence,
Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa,
Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio,
Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban,
Filipino utari, Ainu practices

Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee,
Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta,
Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning

Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats,
Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen
Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective,
Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning

Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance,
Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance,
Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo

Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing,
Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror,
Appreciative apology repair

Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle,
Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette

Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar

Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols

All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in
descriptions. All YAML files validated.

seeds/appreciative-apology-repair.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+id: appreciative-apology-repair
+title: Appreciative Apology and Repair
+description: >-
+  A paired practice for delivering and receiving an apology so that repair
+  actually occurs, drawing on restorative and Nonviolent Communication
+  traditions. Distinct from a defensive or hollow apology.
+source: Restorative communication tradition
+source_url: https://www.iirp.edu/
+tags: [apology, repair, restorative, communication]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Name the act specifically
+    description: >-
+      The person apologising names what they did in specific terms —
+      "I raised my voice and called your idea foolish in the meeting" — not
+      "I'm sorry if you were hurt."
+  - headline: Acknowledge the impact
+    description: >-
+      They describe the impact they understand their action had, without
+      minimising or explaining it away.
+  - headline: Express genuine regret
+    description: >-
+      They express regret for the harm, not for being caught — naming what
+      they wish they had done.
+  - headline: Offer repair
+    description: >-
+      They offer a concrete act of repair — a correction to those present,
+      a changed behaviour, a restitution — and ask if it would help.
+  - headline: Receive and respond
+    description: >-
+      The person harmed receives the apology, names what they need (which
+      may include time), and either accepts the repair or proposes an
+      alternative.
+outcome: >-
+  An apology is delivered and received as repair, with both parties clear
+  on what happened, its impact, and the path forward.
+practice: >-
+  "I'm sorry you felt" is not an apology. "I'm sorry I did" is. The repair
+  must be offered, not imposed — ask what would help, then negotiate.