feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
id: agile-retrospective-five-steps
|
||||
title: Agile Retrospective
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A five-step team reflection meeting held at the end of an iteration to
|
||||
improve process. Formalised in the Agile software development tradition,
|
||||
drawing on Norm Kerth's retrospective prime directive.
|
||||
source: Esther Derby and Diana Larsen, "Agile Retrospectives"
|
||||
source_url: https://www.agileretrospectives.com/
|
||||
tags: [agile, retrospective, teams, improvement]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Set the stage
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The facilitator states the retrospective prime directive and checks in
|
||||
each person briefly, setting psychological safety.
|
||||
- headline: Gather data
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The team collects what happened during the iteration — events,
|
||||
metrics, feelings — without interpretation.
|
||||
- headline: Generate insights
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The team analyses the data for patterns and root causes, asking why
|
||||
things happened as they did.
|
||||
- headline: Decide what to do
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The team selects one or two actionable improvements for the next
|
||||
iteration, with owners and due dates.
|
||||
- headline: Close
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The facilitator closes with appreciation and a check on how the
|
||||
retrospective itself went.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
The team commits to one or two concrete improvements owned by named
|
||||
people, with shared understanding of why.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
The prime directive matters: "Regardless of what we discover, we
|
||||
understand and truly believe that everyone did the best job they could."
|
||||
It prevents blame.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user