feat: initial release of Protocol Droid v0.2.0

A tool for authoring, sharing, and curating social protocols.

Features:
- Protocol library with search, tag filtering, and sort by date/relevance
- Protocol authoring with structured fields (title, description, steps, outcome, practice, source, tags)
- Protocol forking with provenance tracking
- Collection creation with searchable protocol picker and ordering
- User accounts with roles (admin, member, viewer)
- YAML import/export for portability
- Self-hostable on LAMP/Cloudron, works in subdirectories
- Responsive design with hamburger menu on mobile
- About page

Security:
- CSRF protection via Origin/Referer validation
- Session regeneration on login/register
- Secure session cookie params (HttpOnly, SameSite, Secure)
- Visibility enforcement on private/unlisted items
- YAML object injection hardening
- Login rate limiting
- Path traversal protection
- Input validation and length clamping
- Vote value constraining

Stack: PHP 8.x + MySQL/MariaDB, vanilla JS frontend, no external dependencies.

Hippocratic License (HL3-CORE).

seeds/consent-decision-making.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+id: consent-decision-making
+title: Consent Decision-Making
+description: >-
+  A process for making decisions that no one objects to, enabling rapid
+  group decisions without requiring full agreement.
+source: Sociocracy for All
+source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
+tags: [decision, facilitation]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Present the proposal
+    description: >-
+      The proposer reads the proposal aloud. Clarifying questions are
+      allowed, but no discussion yet.
+  - headline: Round of reactions
+    description: >-
+      Each person briefly shares their reaction. No cross-discussion —
+      just hearing all voices.
+  - headline: Amend the proposal
+    description: >-
+      The proposer may amend based on reactions. The group can suggest
+      changes by consent.
+  - headline: Test for consent
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator asks: "Does anyone have a reasoned, paramount
+      objection to this proposal?"
+  - headline: Declare the decision
+    description: >-
+      If no objections remain, the decision is adopted. Objections are
+      integrated and the process repeats from step 3.
+outcome: >-
+  A decision is made that no one has a paramount objection to. The group
+  moves forward without blocking minority voices.
+practice: >-
+  A "reasoned, paramount objection" is not a preference — it must explain
+  why the proposal would cause harm. Practice distinguishing preferences
+  from objections.