Suggestions on automating bicorder analysis #6

Open
opened 2025-12-05 22:40:01 +00:00 by ntnsndr · 0 comments
Owner

From Venkatesh Rao on the SoP Discord:

  1. Default should be short form and it should auto-toggle to long-form if the short form isn’t converging to a clear classification.
  2. UI is a little confusing. If I didn’t already know to expect a slider id be confused by the ascii slider. Maybe a tool tip. And clearer association of the top/bottom legends with left/right. Though ideal would be nom-ascii proper graphics of course.
  3. Live feedback showing something like “Classification confidence: 30%”
  4. When it switches to predicted/automated, UI should maybe show a broader change like switch from red to green color scheme
  5. When done, a little info reward might be nice, like “Your protocol fits the MESSY SWARM cluster.” Like a personality test.
From Venkatesh Rao on the SoP Discord: > 1. Default should be short form and it should auto-toggle to long-form if the short form isn’t converging to a clear classification. > 2. UI is a little confusing. If I didn’t already know to expect a slider id be confused by the ascii slider. Maybe a tool tip. And clearer association of the top/bottom legends with left/right. Though ideal would be nom-ascii proper graphics of course. > 3. Live feedback showing something like “Classification confidence: 30%” > 4. When it switches to predicted/automated, UI should maybe show a broader change like switch from red to green color scheme > 5. When done, a little info reward might be nice, like “Your protocol fits the MESSY SWARM cluster.” Like a personality test.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder#6