Analysis updates and json tweaks
This commit is contained in:
27
bicorder.txt
27
bicorder.txt
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
|
||||
monopolistic < [---------] > pluralistic
|
||||
|
||||
EXPERIENCE
|
||||
sufficient < [---------] > incomplete
|
||||
sufficient < [---------] > limited
|
||||
crystallized < [---------] > contested
|
||||
trust-evading < [---------] > trust-inducing
|
||||
predictable < [---------] > emergent
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
|
||||
ANALYSIS
|
||||
hardness < [---------] > softness
|
||||
polarized < [---------] > centrist
|
||||
bureaucratic < [---------] > relational
|
||||
not useful < [---------] > very useful
|
||||
|
||||
GLOSSARY
|
||||
@@ -47,9 +48,10 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
|
||||
| -------------- | ----------- |
|
||||
| abstract | Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually |
|
||||
| alive | Actively utilized by relevant participants |
|
||||
| bureaucratic | The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement |
|
||||
| centrist | The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients |
|
||||
| contested | Content and meaning are disputed or under debate |
|
||||
| crystallized | Content and meaning are settled and widely agreed upon |
|
||||
| contested | Content or meaning are disputed or under debate |
|
||||
| crystallized | Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon |
|
||||
| dead | Not actively utilized by relevant participants |
|
||||
| defensible | Strong boundaries and protections against external influence |
|
||||
| documenting | The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring |
|
||||
@@ -59,28 +61,29 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
|
||||
| enabling | The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise |
|
||||
| enforced | Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions |
|
||||
| ephemeral | Designed to vanish when no longer needed |
|
||||
| exclusion | The protocol creates barriers or excludes certain participants |
|
||||
| exclusion | Creates barriers or excludes certain participants |
|
||||
| explicit | The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants |
|
||||
| exposed | Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence |
|
||||
| flocking | Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry |
|
||||
| hardness | The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness |
|
||||
| implicit | The design is not stated explicitly but is learned by participants in another way |
|
||||
| inclusion | The protocol reduces barriers and includes diverse participants |
|
||||
| incomplete | Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants |
|
||||
| institutional | Design occurs through processes that involve powerful institutions and widespread recognition as normative |
|
||||
| implicit | The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use |
|
||||
| inclusion | Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants |
|
||||
| institutional | Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions |
|
||||
| interpretive | The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation |
|
||||
| liberating | Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought |
|
||||
| limited | Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants |
|
||||
| macro | Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope |
|
||||
| malleable | Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs |
|
||||
| micro | Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope |
|
||||
| monopolistic | Excludes the use of other protocols that might be available to adopt |
|
||||
| monopolistic | Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes |
|
||||
| not useful | The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol |
|
||||
| obligatory | Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents |
|
||||
| particular | Addressed to a specific community |
|
||||
| particular | Tailored for a specific community |
|
||||
| pluralistic | Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use |
|
||||
| polarized | The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings |
|
||||
| precise | The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation |
|
||||
| predictable | Produces expected and consistent outcomes |
|
||||
| relational | The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation |
|
||||
| restraining | Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness |
|
||||
| self-enforcing | Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms |
|
||||
| social | Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups |
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +96,7 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
|
||||
| technical | Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies |
|
||||
| trust-evading | Minimizes the need for trust among participants |
|
||||
| trust-inducing | Relies on or cultivates trust among participants |
|
||||
| universal | Addressed to a global audience |
|
||||
| vernacular | Design occurs through evolving, peer-to-peer community interactions in order to suit participant-defined goals |
|
||||
| universal | Meant for global adoption across different communities |
|
||||
| vernacular | Design occurs through evolving community interactions |
|
||||
| very useful | The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol |
|
||||
| voluntary | Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user