1.2 KiB
MEDLab Contributor Evaluation
The purpose of this document is to provide and document feedback for those who hold active contributor roles in MEDLab. It should be used at both the midterm and end of any period of engagement, as specified in an agreement.
Upon receipt of this form, the supervisor and the contributor should plan to meet to discuss its contents. The contributor may also choose to respond in writing. The form and any written response should be retained in MEDLab’s internal records.
Contributor: {Name}
Role: {Title}
Supervisor: {Name}
Term: {Season YYYY}
Date: {Date}
Strengths and accomplishments of the contributor during this term:
{Feedback}
Shortcomings of the contributor's work, in light of the pending agreement:
{Feedback}
Specific opportunities for improvement in the future:
{Feedback}
Evaluation: {Number}
The evaluation system is the same as that used for faculty at CU Boulder. They are as follows:
- 5: Outstanding
- 4: Exceeding Expectations
- 3: Meeting Expectations
- 2: Below Expectations
- 1: Fails to Meet Expectations
This document is part of a process that is subject to ongoing evolution. If you have feedback about your experience with it, please share it with the MEDLab director.