layout: rule title: Do-ocracy permalink: /templates/do-ocracy/ icon: /assets/tabler_icons/lock-open.svg
community-name:
structure: Those who take initiative to do work for the community can decide how they do that work. If any community members hold serious concerns, they can start a proposal to halt what someone is doing. mission: values: This community shares a bias for action and a commitment to empowering and encouraging its members. Exceptions should be on the basis of serious ethical or moral concerns, not disagreements. Do-ers should keep in mind the best interests of the community as a whole and consult with community members when those interests are not clear. legal:
membership: A member is anyone who has actively contributed to the community's mission within the past year. removal: If a member believes another member is not respecting the serious concerns of others, a proposal for removal may be submitted. The proposal goes for a vote before all members for 1 week. If at least 2/3 of voting members agree with the proposal, the offending member is removed. roles: limits: If a member exhibits disregard for others' serious concerns, they can be removed from the community.
rights: Members have a right to decide how they make their contributions, while other members have the right to object on the basis of serious concerns. decision: Individual members and subgroups can decide what and how they want to contribute to the community, reasonably respecting the community's precedent and the expressed opinions of others. implementation: Community members are responsible for carrying out their own initiatives, and they will not expect any other members to do so, except by those members' own volition. oversight: If another member holds serious ethical or moral concerns, that member can create a proposal stating clearly what actions should be prohibited. The proposal goes for a vote before all members for 1 week. If at least 2/3 of voting members agree with the proposal, it passes and becomes a policy for the community.
access: economics: deliberation: grievances:
records:
Use this template as-is or edit it to adapt it to your community.
Blends do-ocracy and lazy consensus.