id: mastodon-federation-governance title: Mastodon Federation Governance Vote description: >- A governance practice in the Mastodon fediverse community where instance members vote on policies, codes of conduct, and moderation decisions, often through structured discussion on the instance's local timeline or governance channel. Reflecting the federated, cooperative ethos of the Mastodon project founded by Eugen Rochko. source: Mastodon project / fediverse governance tradition source_url: https://joinmastodon.org/ tags: [mastodon, fediverse, governance, federation, online] forked_from: null image: null steps: - headline: Post the proposal publicly description: >- The instance administrator or a member posts a proposal — a policy change, a moderation rule, a federation decision — on the instance's governance channel, with a clear question and a discussion period. - headline: Discuss openly description: >- Members discuss the proposal on the channel for a set period (often a week). Discussion is visible to all members, not held in private backchannels. - headline: Vote description: >- After discussion, a vote is held — often a simple poll with agree/disagree/abstain. The threshold for adoption is set in advance and visible. - headline: Implement and record description: >- The administrator implements the decision and records it in the instance's public governance record, with the vote tally noted. - headline: Federate the outcome description: >- Where the decision affects federation (blocking or allowing other instances), the outcome is communicated so other instance admins can take note. outcome: >- Instance policies are decided with member input, recorded publicly, and communicated to the wider federation. practice: >- Discussion before voting, not after, is the discipline. A vote without prior discussion is a stamp, not a decision. Record the tally — transparency builds trust in federated spaces.