Protocol BICORDER [Protocol] [Description] [Analyst] [Standpoint] [Timestamp] DESIGN explicit < [---------] > implicit precise < [---------] > interpretive institutional < [---------] > vernacular documenting < [---------] > enabling static < [---------] > malleable technical < [---------] > social universal < [---------] > particular durable < [---------] > ephemeral ENTANGLEMENT macro < [---------] > micro sovereign < [---------] > subsidiary self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced abstract < [---------] > embodied obligatory < [---------] > voluntary flocking < [---------] > swarming defensible < [---------] > exposed monopolistic < [---------] > pluralistic EXPERIENCE sufficient < [---------] > limited crystallized < [---------] > contested trust-evading < [---------] > trust-inducing predictable < [---------] > emergent exclusion < [---------] > inclusion restraining < [---------] > liberating dead < [---------] > alive ANALYSIS hardness < [---------] > softness polarized < [---------] > centrist formal < [---------] > informal not useful < [---------] > very useful GLOSSARY | Term | Description | | -------------- | ----------- | | abstract | Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually | | alive | Actively utilized by relevant participants | | centrist | The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients | | contested | Content or meaning are disputed or under debate | | crystallized | Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon | | dead | Not actively utilized by relevant participants | | defensible | Strong boundaries and protections against external influence | | documenting | Intended to document or validate activity that is occurring | | durable | Designed to be persistently available | | embodied | Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it | | emergent | Produces unexpected or novel outcomes | | enabling | Intended to enable activity that might not happen otherwise | | enforced | Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions | | ephemeral | Designed to vanish when no longer needed | | exclusion | Creates barriers or excludes certain participants | | explicit | Design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants | | exposed | Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence | | flocking | Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry | | formal | Exhibits bureaucratic characteristics with centralized control and predictable enforcement | | hardness | The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness | | implicit | Design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use | | inclusion | Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants | | informal | Exhibits relational characteristics with distributed coordination embedded in culture | | institutional | Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions | | interpretive | Ambiguous design, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation | | liberating | Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought | | limited | Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants | | macro | Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope | | malleable | Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs | | micro | Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope | | monopolistic | Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes | | not useful | The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol | | obligatory | Compulsory participation for a certain class of agents | | particular | Tailored for a specific community | | pluralistic | Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use | | polarized | The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings | | precise | Specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation | | predictable | Produces expected and consistent outcomes | | restraining | Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness | | self-enforcing | Rules automatically enforced through its own mechanisms | | social | Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups | | softness | The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness | | sovereign | A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity | | static | Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible | | subsidiary | An operating logic under the control of a particular entity | | sufficient | Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants | | swarming | Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction | | technical | Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies | | trust-evading | Minimizes the need for trust among participants | | trust-inducing | Relies on or cultivates trust among participants | | universal | Meant for global adoption across different communities | | vernacular | Design occurs through evolving community interactions | | very useful | The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol | | voluntary | Participation is optional and not coerced |