diff --git a/docs/about/resources.md b/docs/about/resources.md
index aa4969f..b363502 100644
--- a/docs/about/resources.md
+++ b/docs/about/resources.md
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Help build a bibliography in the [Democratic Mediums group on Zotero](https://ww
 
 ## Related directories
 
+* [CommunityWiki](https://communitywiki.org/wiki/FrontPage)
 * [#dgov foundation](https://dgov.foundation)
     - [Wiki](https://wiki.dgov.foundation/)
     - [DAO Landscape Report](https://dao-landscape.gitbook.io/project/), including "On-Chain Governance Case Studies"
diff --git a/docs/index.md b/docs/index.md
index b56b67f..d627dd8 100644
--- a/docs/index.md
+++ b/docs/index.md
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ The future of self-governance is being made today. What tools do we have to work
 
 <div id="pullquote">Democratic Mediums is a directory of patterns for decision, deliberation, and noise.</div>
 
-This is an early-stage project that is mostly incomplete. Browse some sample entries: [Board](mediums/board.md), [Bureaucracy](mediums/bureaucracy.md), [Condorcet](mediums/condorcet.md), [Continuous voting](mediums/continuous_voting.md), [Delegation](mediums/delegation.md), [Federation](mediums/federation.md), [Ownership](mediums/ownership.md), [Quadratic voting](mediums/quadratic_voting.md), [Ritual](mediums/ritual.md), [Sortition](mediums/sortition.md).
+This is an early-stage project that is mostly incomplete. Browse some sample entries: [Board](mediums/board.md), [Bureaucracy](mediums/bureaucracy.md), [Canvassing](mediums/canvassing.md), [Condorcet](mediums/condorcet.md), [Continuous voting](mediums/continuous_voting.md), [Delegation](mediums/delegation.md), [Do-ocracy](mediums/do-ocracy.md), [Federation](mediums/federation.md), [Ownership](mediums/ownership.md), [Quadratic voting](mediums/quadratic_voting.md), [Ritual](mediums/ritual.md), [Sortition](mediums/sortition.md).
diff --git a/docs/mediums/.template.md b/docs/mediums/.template.md
index 2d9021a..ec2ea04 100644
--- a/docs/mediums/.template.md
+++ b/docs/mediums/.template.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# TITLE
+# Title
 
 <!-- brief summary of the medium, no more than a handful of sentences
 
diff --git a/docs/mediums/canvassing.md b/docs/mediums/canvassing.md
index 65ce58f..adaed47 100644
--- a/docs/mediums/canvassing.md
+++ b/docs/mediums/canvassing.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Canvassing is an activity performed by individuals wishing to reach others for a
 
 Canvassing as a strategy to reach potential supporters has a long history. In the Roman Republic, candidates would introduce themselves to individuals at the Forum and attempt to gain their political support. In Elizabethan-era England, candidates sought to determine whether they had enough votes to win before announcing interest in a Parliament seat. Canvassing thus served as an indicator of whether or not a candidate had enough support to continue running; if they did not secure enough votes, they would drop out. 
 
-In the United States, an extremely low voter turnout in 1996 led to studies on the effects of canvassing. Now seen as an important political tool, canvassing has become more widely practiced since the early 2000s.
+In the United States, an extremely low voter turnout in 1996 led to studies on the effects of canvassing. Canvassing has become more widely practiced since the early 2000s.
 
 ## Feedback loops
 
diff --git a/docs/mediums/do-ocracy.md b/docs/mediums/do-ocracy.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..64e6882
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/mediums/do-ocracy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Do-ocracy
+
+Do-ocracy is a methodology by which those who take initative to do work in a group are empowered to make decisions about what they do. It tends to appear most often in informal organizations characterized by high levels of mutual trust and a dependence on contributions by highly motivated volunteers.
+
+**Input:** self-directed individuals or subgroups, tacit permission from larger group
+
+**Output:** self-directed outcomes
+
+## Background
+
+A portmanteau of the verb "to do" and the suffix "-ocracy," the word *do-ocracy* first appears [in Word Spy](https://wordspy.com/index.php?word=do-ocracy) in 2004. It appears again in 2012, in reference to a co-working space and the hacker phenomenon Anonymous. The radio program _A Way with Words_ [attributes](https://www.waywordradio.org/do-ocracy/) the popularization of the word with the 2011 Occupy movement.
+
+[According to CommunityWiki](https://communitywiki.org/wiki/DoOcracy), "The term is popular with libertarian management afficionados and BurningMan participants." The wiki for the San Francisco hackerspace Noisebridge refers to it as "a decentralized, anarchist way of deciding and managing how things get changed" and offers this summary: "If you want something done, do it, but remember to be excellent to each other when doing so."
+
+## Feedback loops
+
+### Sensitivities
+
+* Participant initative and sense of ownership
+* Eliminates cost of formal governance practices in high-trust contexts
+* Authority closest to the question at hand
+
+### Oversights
+
+* Unintended conflicts when participants act against the will of others
+* Empowerment those with the most free time with the most authority
+* Burnout when responsibilities aren't adequately shared
+* Lack of coordination and coherence in group efforts
+
+## Implementations
+
+### Communities
+
+* Edgeryders, a European social innovation network, [has as a motto](https://www.thenation.com/article/can-monasteries-be-model-reclaiming-tech-culture-good/), "Who does the work calls the shots"
+* [Ouishare](https://www.ouishare.net/our-dna), a collaborative economy network, holds do-ocracy as one of its core "values"
+
+### Tools
+
+Do-ocracy practices can be facilitated by common collaboration tools like Git issue systems and wekan boards
+
+## Further resources
+
+* [DoOcracy entry at CommunityWiki]
+* [Lazy consensus](lazy_consensus.md) blends do-ocracy with [consensus process](consensus_process.md)